tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8902741043153755588.post2258676335520399443..comments2011-03-01T04:21:24.560+11:00Dale Fraserhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08986411397740062717noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8902741043153755588.post-41884637647132209982011-03-01T02:37:42.617+11:002011-03-01T02:37:42.617+11:00I&#39;d rather have straight ECMAScript support, rather than ActionScript. Why not just give me a language I can use on both the server and the client side?<br /><br />Imagine how much easier it would be if you could write a single code base to validate data both on the server and client side.DaSwitzhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12216034024718491382noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8902741043153755588.post-59421790142109672602011-02-28T19:44:38.877+11:002011-02-28T19:44:38.877+11:00Yeah, i thought about the same for some time already. Truth is, AS3 also has issues, all the things they took from ECMA are super, but things they avoided make AS3 uncomplete language for modern enterprise development. Adobe did super job with Flash virtual machine and AS is far more consistent and extendable then cfscript and cfml. We&#39;ll see what will they do.Zarkohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15985017225593232955noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8902741043153755588.post-16329494010896430752011-02-28T19:26:23.673+11:002011-02-28T19:26:23.673+11:00Trying to pre-empt the Scotch on the Rocks keynote? :)<br /><br />I&#39;d like to see a commitment to increasing performance, and making the current language more useful.<br /><br />The one thing I never want to see is cfscript deprecated in favour of ActionScript. ActionScript as an optional server-side language would no doubt be useful to some people though, so I&#39;m not against it!Justin Carterhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08237179695906464222noreply@blogger.com